Health Care

Health Care Round-Up: The Post Office, PowerPoint and Twitter

Published June 18, 2009 @ 10:40PM PT

Had I but world enough and time, I could probably write a post an hour and still not keep up with everything going on in health care right now.  Although much of the content this week has been frustrating, it’s also exhilarating, and a lot more positive overall than in the parallel universe where President McCain is putting health care on the backburner yet again.  In an attempt to “catch up,” here are three mini-posts – all for the price of one!

1.)    The Daily Show:  “Heal or No Heal”


The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Heal or No Heal
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Jason Jones in Iran

Absolutely hysterical.  You’ll notice I don’t write a lot about Rep. Boehner’s semi-daily tirades against the push to reform health care in Congress.  The primary reason is he seldom, if ever, is actually pushing a few concrete ideas from the GOP perspective.  (When they do – like with the Patients Choice Act – I tend to write a lot about them).

But the secondary reason is I usually just don’t get his talking points.  I know making fun of the post office was the cool thing to do 25 years ago, but let’s get down to brass tacks:  I put my Father’s Day card in the mail tonight, going to one of the busiest post offices in Manhattan, and waited maybe two minutes total.  As a bonus, my dad will get his card hundreds of miles away on Saturday morning.  And all it cost me was a little under $9 for a book of 20 stamps.

Seriously, I would be lucky if my next trip to the hospital was half that efficient!

2.)    Senate Finance Committee Legislation – now in PowerPoint!

Ezra Klein scores the big exclusive with a pirate copy of the current draft of Sen. Max Baucus’ bill after he went on a “cutting the cost of the plan by 40%” spree.  Honestly, it never occurred to me that Senators would need to have their complex legislation proposing a reform of $2.4 trillion in combined public and private spending reduced to PowerPoint bullets.  Although it makes sense.  I’m dying to see if this sucker had animated transitions or not.

Ezra thinks the bill is not good but not terrible.  I think it’s basically Massachusetts – let’s just look at the subsidies for those who cannot afford premiums in the Health Exchanges.  Finance was never going to propose subsidies up to 500% of the poverty line (although it’s working just fine in San Francisco despite the worst fiscal crisis in California state history), but 400% was a realistic goal.  To accomplish nothing in particular except the satisfaction of gutting their own proposal, they’ve scaled subsidies back to 300%, which means a sizable chunk of the uninsured will have to be exempted from the individual mandate, like they are in Massachusetts, because there are no affordable options.  They might have been able to afford the strongest versions of the public plan (Medicare that you can buy into), but Finance leaves out a public plan entirely.  So the uninsured above 300% of poverty get nothin’.

The Walker Report isn’t far off the mark when he writes, “the health insurance industry wrote a better proposal than the Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee.”  But did they use PowerPoint?

3.)    Media ignorance, explained in six words

Mark Halperin on TIME’s The Page is usually a bastion of conventional wisdom, and has a good sense of the current group-think pack mentality that so dominates the mainstream media.  He lists 5 reasons to bet on health care happening this year, and 5 reasons to bet against it.  Reason #3 to bet against it?

“The public is not demanding action.”

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

I’ve lost track of how many times I’ve read a news story that says, “Wow, where did these grassroots people come from?” or “Obama is mobilizing his army” or “Single-payer is mounting an offensive to get into the conversation.”  Ditto the polling, which consistently shows strong support for health care reform, and the new poll that shows overwhelming support for a public health insurance option.

But this translates to us not demanding action.  They see what they want to see – which perhaps explains why the Senate Finance Committee is hell-bent on giving Chuck Grassley what he wants and the American people very little of what they want.

I guess we’re just not speaking the same language, so please accept this note to reporters covering health care and to the members of the Unites States Senate: When you are a "hammer" u think evrything is NAIL American ppl r no NAIL!

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (4)

  1. Danetta Amschler

    A hospital visit that compares in efficiency to that story of the post office?  I'll guarantee two things - neither insurance was involved (they'd be actively working to impede care and thus efficiency - and possibly your admission to the hospital or to push for having you sent home long before really well) or the current version of public health which is as it stands has all too long been underfunded, full of incompetence (and in some cases/locations worse stuff like fraud or gross breaches of ethics) and are so often used for doctor training (not that doctor training isn't necessary) that it can take months or years to get a diagnosis if the diagnosis isn't painfully obvious.

    I still don't get how anyone thinks we the people don't want single payer or any other public option.  I know that *I* have been sending tons of letters and faxes saying that I do.  I know there have been many letter, fax and call campaigns.  I know there was the arrest of those who tried to get into the committee to speak about single payer.  I know there have been national marches and will be a big one in DC next week - about single payer.  Even if you don't look at the push for specifically single payer, there are still many who want insurance specifically either tightly reigned or completely removed from the picture.  Chosen ignorance of the people's voice doesn't mean we're not speaking nor that we're not saying what we're saying.

    Posted by Danetta Amschler on 06/19/2009 @ 07:10AM PT

  2. Martin Bring

    And furthermore, look what happens when they try to cram reform into this model. They expect an individual or a family with an income of 300% of the federal poverty level to pay 15% of their income for the premium alone, and for that they receive a plan that covers only 65% of the actuarial value of their health care services. They would require Americans to pay to private insurers a premium that they can't afford, to purchase an underinsurance product that would fail to prevent financial hardship should they need health care, and to fine them should they fail to comply.

    They continue to craft policies that impair the health care finances and health care access of far too many of us merely to ensure the viability of the obsolete, dysfunctional insurance industry. Talk about perverse priorities!

    Posted by Martin Bring on 06/19/2009 @ 08:06PM PT

  3. Reply to thread
  4. Carla Rautenberg

    Gee, Danetta, maybe we're living in Iran...

    Posted by Carla Rautenberg on 06/19/2009 @ 06:41PM PT

  5. Danetta Amschler

    I don't think we're in Iran, but there's most certainly some one or ones manipulating the process and quite successfully at that. 

    Posted by Danetta Amschler on 06/20/2009 @ 08:29AM PT

  6. Reply to thread

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Timothy Foley

Tim has been an online organizer and blogger on health care policy for the Obama for America campaign (during the primaries) and currently for the Committee of Interns and Residents/SEIU Healthcare, a labor union for intern and resident doctors. Views expressed here are Tim's, and don't represent the positions of CIR or SEIU.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.