House Health Reform Passes! An Early Start to the Holiday Season
Published November 09, 2009 @ 06:00AM PT

We got an early start to the holiday season during an exciting and historic weekend. Obama reminded House Democrats that they have developed more comprehensive reform than any Congress in the last 70 years, and that it was a historic opportunity to pass it. Democrats responded by passing HR 3962 by 220-215 (two more votes than necessary) and with one Republican to make it “bipartisan”. Like Thanksgiving, though, it didn’t happen without a lot of carnage beforehand. Now the rude and boorish relatives are settling in until the New Year.
First, if you missed the Republican “debate” on the bill, you can see it at the end of yesterday’s post. Apparently acting like a bullying child in response to women exercising their right to free speech is what passes for public representation now. The GOP alternative healthcare reform “plan” was just as hollow, and following an amusing rant by Education and Labor Chairman George Miller, below (“Wanna buy it? Wanna try it? Wanna sell it? Come on America, buy this one. You're guaranteed to be left behind if you're left behind today."), the House duly rejected it 176-258.
Second, one destructive plan that did pass was the anti-abortion Stupak amendment, which seeks to bar abortion services within any plan participating in the Insurance Exchange, ostensibly to avoid federal funding of abortion. When the effect is to eliminate this service from private plan benefits just because some plan members may receive federal subsidies, it goes too far. You can tell the administration so here.
Third, Dennis Kucinich and Anthony Weiner had their single payer bill and amendment mistakenly lost, then deliberately fire bombed, by Nancy Pelosi. As a result, Kucinich voted against HR 3962, because it is legislation “ … in which the government incentivizes the perpetuation, indeed the strengthening, of the for-profit health insurance industry, the very source of the problem.”
Regardless of the carnage, a healthcare reform bill did pass one chamber of Congress. Truman didn’t accomplish that. Neither did Nixon, Carter, or Clinton. Now we can bask in the tryptophan glow before heeding Obama’s call to “pass the baton” to the Senate. I'm not sure what kind of relay he thinks Congress is running – the 4 x 1600 backwards mosey? The Senate, especially, is looking more like the Yankees every day.
There is a reason for that. The Senate holds lots of rude and boorish relative types, and here comes one now. It’s Joe Lieberman, opening his big mouth again. Sunday on FOX “News” he renewed his pledge to filibuster as a matter of conscience (I didn’t know he had one) if the Senate healthcare bill has a public option, because it’s just unnecessary. Yes Joe, putting effective cost containment measures in legislation does seem over the top, doesn’t it? You can tell him so here. Then brace yourself for lots of family infighting as Harry Reid tries to get the Senate bill to the floor before the end of the year.
Update: Find out how your representative voted on women's reproductive rights and take action to thank them or spank them here.
Photo Pete Souza, The White House
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Why Do We Need a Public Option Anyway?
-
Senate Health Bill: Less, Later, and Holy Complexity Batman (P1)
-
4 Potential Healthcare Roadblocks in the Senate
Comments (20)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email


















After the Senate passes its bill (keeping fingers crossed) Americans will discover that health care reform has thus far been a huge giveaway to vested wealthy interests and that they, the American taxpayers, are now in a postion of economic servitude to the health insurance industry.
Time to Kill the Pseudo-Public Option -- and Other Things to Tell Your Representative
The Wyden "Free Choice" Amendment: The President and other Democrats told the American people they would provide "all Americans" with the choice of a public option. Instead, they've artificially restricted access to it (while leaving private insurers free to pursue everyone). The Wyden Amendment will deliver what the Democrats promised, and will lower overall health costs.
The Kucinich Amendment: The so-called Kucinich Amendment would have allowed states to opt out of the Federal system to create intrastate single-payer plans. It was approved by the Education and Labor Committee, but was stripped from the final House bill. The end result? The Senate says states can "opt out" of the public option, but the House says they can't opt out of the private system. That doesn't seem right.
Tolerable premiums and out-of-pocket costs: It's hard to ask a family of four living on $88,000 to pay 12% of its income in premiums, yet still face $1,500-per-person copays and total possible costs of $10,000 per year. (That's better than the Senate version, however.) These provisions have to be made less onerous for working families. Health analysts used to employ a guideline that said 12% of family income should be the total expense for healthcare, or the "ceiling" on possible health costs, not - as this bill would have it - the floor or minimum cost.
No dumping or foul play: Many of the insurance industry's bad behaviors are banned by the House bill (which, complaints aside, has many good features.) But there need to be stronger protections against subtle abuses designed to drive sick people out of private plans. These abuses might include planned provider shortages in needed specialties (e.g. oncology, high-risk neonatology), delays in claims payment, and obstructionist use of prior authorization program.
Make drug costs manageable: Jane Hamsher describes the perils faced by breast cancer patients, and those with other conditions that require expensive patented drugs. Many of Jane's concerns will be addressed by the bill's caps on out-of-pocket costs, and by the elimination of lifetime maximums. But more should be done to ensure that drugs are made generic as quickly as possible, and to restrict the insurance industry practice of labeling them "experimental" and refusing to cover them.
Posted by Martin Bring on 11/09/2009 @ 09:46AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I hear you, they also have to remember that being a woman isn't a "pre-existing condition" :)
As well, no trigger, because triggers don't get pulled. Also, please, advocate for singlepayer healthcare, with Community First Choice Option and CLASS Act (Community Choice Act for the handicapped, elderly, autistic, disabled, etc.); H.R. 676 & S. 703, are the best of the lot, so far; i.m.h.o..
Healthcare Reform Actions :)
http://healthcare.change.org/actions/view/healthcare_reform_actions
http://www.change.org/profile/189788/actions
Related group and actions :)
http://www.singlepayeraction.org//join.html
Posted by james m nordlund on 11/09/2009 @ 01:54PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I updated the post with a link to find out how your representative voted on women's reproductive rights and take action: http://action.nwlc.org/site/VoteCenter?page=voteInfo&voteId=10177
Posted by Gillian Hubble on 11/09/2009 @ 03:26PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
"You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away men's Initiative and independence. You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln
Posted by Jason Jaytheman on 11/10/2009 @ 05:47AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Freedom is not the right to do what we want, but what we ought. Let us have faith that right makes might and in that faith let us; to the end, dare to do our duty as we understand it. (A. Lincoln)
Sir, my concern is not whether God is on our side; my greatest concern is to be on God's side, for God is always right. (A. Lincoln)
1We who are strong ought to bear with the failings of the weak and not to please ourselves. 2Each of us should please his neighbor for his good, to build him up. (Rom. 15:1-2)
"Because of the oppression of the weak
and the groaning of the needy,
I will now arise," says the LORD.
"I will protect them from those who malign them." (Ps. 12:5)
"Blessed is he who has regard for the weak; the LORD delivers him in times of trouble." (Ps.41:1)
"Defend the cause of the weak and fatherless; maintain the rights of the poor and oppressed." (Ps. 82:3)
4 You have not strengthened the weak or healed the sick or bound up the injured. You have not brought back the strays or searched for the lost. You have ruled them harshly and brutally. 5 So they were scattered because there was no shepherd, and when they were scattered they became food for all the wild animals. (Ez. 34:4-5)
I will search for the lost and bring back the strays. I will bind up the injured and strengthen the weak, but the sleek and the strong I will destroy. I will shepherd the flock with justice. (Ez. 34:16)
In everything I did, I showed you that by this kind of hard work we must help the weak, remembering the words the Lord Jesus himself said: 'It is more blessed to give than to receive.' (Acts 20:35)
29But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, "And who is my neighbor?"
30In reply Jesus said: "A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he fell into the hands of robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead. 31A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. 32So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. 33But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. 34He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, took him to an inn and took care of him. 35The next day he took out two silver coins[e] and gave them to the innkeeper. 'Look after him,' he said, 'and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.'
36"Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?"
37The expert in the law replied, "The one who had mercy on him."
Jesus told him, "Go and do likewise." (Luke 10:29-37)
"The welfare of each of us is dependent fundamentally upon the welfare of all of us." (Theodore Roosevelt)
"There is not a man of us who does not at times need a helping hand to be stretched out to him, and then shame upon him who will not stretch out the helping hand to his brother." (T. Roosevelt)
"Competition has been shown to be useful up to a certain point and no further, but cooperation, which is the thing we must strive for today, begins where competition leaves off." (FDR)
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much it is whether we provide enough for those who have little." (FDR)
"There is no higher religion than human service. To work for the common good is the greatest creed." (Woodrow Wilson)
"There can be no equality or opportunity if men and women and children be not shielded in their lives from the consequences of great industrial and social processes which they cannot alter, control, or singly cope with." (Woodrow Wilson)
Posted by Harold Lewis on 11/10/2009 @ 07:02AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Dear Gillian, et Al,
Excellent work, this directly relates :)
support women's healthcare now
or, Create a Petition
Change.org
support women's healthcare now
http://womensrights.change.org/actions/view/support_womens_healthcare_now
Posted by james m nordlund on 11/10/2009 @ 05:29PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
How much control over your healthcare do you want the government to have? I read an interesting blog article that just about sums it up for me @ http://theminusopinion.blogspot.com
Posted by Jeff Hilton on 11/15/2009 @ 02:31PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Sorry, that link was http://theminusopinion.wordpress.com
Sorry for the mixup.
Posted by Jeff Hilton on 11/15/2009 @ 03:41PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Don't forget:
1) That the Senate proposals are far more conservative than the House bill and the public plan won't get past a Senate filibuster,
2) Most Americans won't accept health care as a right,
3) The White House is not behind us,
4) The bills scuttle local efforts by leaving the States no choice but to participate in private insurance,
5) The long, drawn out reforms will leave Congress the ability to have us waiting years before we can properly evaluate and criticize the bills.
It's time for a mid-term election strategy. This battle's over. It's time to dig in for the war.
Posted by Harold Lewis on 11/09/2009 @ 12:19PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Let's start an undeclared war for healthcare.
http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/forward/emailref/36340
Posted by Mary Acosta on 11/12/2009 @ 11:52AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Action suggestion for certain parts of the country:
Fry's/ Safeway workers may strike in AZ. This issue is making employees contribute to medical coverage for the first time.
http://www.abc15.com/content/news/phoenixmetro/central/story/Strike-could-cripple-Safeway-Frys-stores-across/dQ432PgWWUiMpQPrJdCHdw.cspx
Now, we can be like the crotchety Scrooges decrying the fact that it will be only $5-$15/ week, that other people, like ourselves, have been contributing more for years, or think they should be grateful to their masters when unemployment is running high. But, I think this is an opportunity to make some statements:
- It's a wage cut, no matter how little it seems.
- Just because many of us put up with contributory amounts doesn't make it right. Too often, there's a hazing mentality in wanting to inflict like troubles on others - very un-Christian - malice toward fellow citizens on our own level or below and look upward to the powerful for approval of the stomping order.
If where you live you have these grocery chains, it might help to boycott them altogether.
Posted by Harold Lewis on 11/09/2009 @ 12:42PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I have a friend who works at Frys, and I just went shopping. He didn't have much to say about the strike, but I do! Thanks for the post idea Harold.
Posted by Gillian Hubble on 11/09/2009 @ 01:03PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
This i sort of like making kids pay for health care. It is a pay-cut/tax or something. Ya, like they can afford it. Go ahead congress, kill our economy, idiots.
Posted by James Turner on 11/12/2009 @ 03:24AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
At this point we should tell our legislators that we insist on a Medicare 4 All PO. I am still wondering if that is what they are trying to accomplish.
If not, then the next thing is civil disobedience. Don't purchase insurance. Sit in at your legislators office until you get an appointment.
Listen, the more people who find out that everyone is handing hard earned money over to the health insurers, the sooner we will see Congress do the right thing. As hard as it is to believe, alot of Americans are clueless about what is in the bill and what the results will be. They have insurance through their employer.
Of course we all wanted this to be over, months ago already. To tell you the truth I am sick and tired of spending all my spare time on the internet and god knows my family is wondering whether I can talk about anything other than health care reform. We all need to take a deeeeeep breath and think where we would be if the house had not passed a bill. This isn't over yet. We have to use all our resources to help educate people about what is in this bill and how, even though it provides some protections, does not control costs and offers the health insurance industry millions of customers.
Listen, the whole stupid thing isn't supposed to take effect until 2013. There is time to craft a bill that will solve the problem. I hope we don't have to wait THAT long. but it truly is up to us. I agree with Harold, it's time to play a tougher game.
Posted by Lauren Serven on 11/09/2009 @ 02:50PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Thank GOD this Titanic of a Bill (or should I say the iceberg) will be completely sunk by common sense. Pelosi had her hollow victory, and heads will roll in 2010 and beyond if this debacle goes any further. These left-wing nut jobs like Pelosi are are unwittingly creating their own term limits.
Posted by James Dunham on 11/09/2009 @ 02:56PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Abortion is the only activity where the government steps in and says that taxpayer dollars ought not fund it because some people have a conscionable moral objection to it based on religious faith.
Millions of Americans were against the "police action" in Vietnam. Did their tax-dollars go to it? You bet they did. Love it or Leave it! Millions of Americans were against our invasion of Iraq. Did their tax-dollars go to it? You bet they did. Love it or Leave it! Millions of people are against abortion. However, this is a country where State and Church are separate. Love it or Leave it!
Abortion is a medical procedure which health insurance should cover like any other medical procedure whether under a Single Payer system or the sort of health care reform now being advanced that relies on taxpayer subsidies.
Until we all get 401K's that provide a checklist of government funded projects that we can choose to support or not with our tax-dollars, Catholics, Protestants, and other religious persons should shut up about subsidized stem cell research and abortion. Love it or Leave it!
Posted by Martin Bring on 11/09/2009 @ 05:55PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I've had probable swine flu for two weeks (just now recovering). Had to go to the ER because my lungs wouldn't work well enough- my asthma was trying (again) to kill me- even after it was under control my 02 stats were borderline. I was also tacycardic (140 beats per minute while half asleep). Basically I was a mess. I'm sure the bill will be lovely, they can add it to my tab. The ER doctor prescribed Tamiflu- I am in the group that is suppose to take it. I couldn't afford the price tag. I ended up coughing up blood and on an antibiotic- probable pneumonia, but I didn't want to go to the ER for another chest x-ray. I seriously wonder if tamiflu would have prevented all of that ugliness.
I just want healthcare. Affordable, accessible healthcare. I can compromise a LOT. I can compromise single payer, I can compromise government option, I can compromise reproductive rights (to a point, at least). At one point of time I was more picky- I am no longer. Politicians who won't compromise are no more helpful that the ones who want to keep what we have.
Posted by Erin Monk on 11/10/2009 @ 07:52PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I just received my annual renewal notice from United HealthCare in the mail today and have determined that the health insurance reform that I (and so many others here) have been advocating for so long must be passed along with the inclusion of a strong public option or a single payer system.
I own a small business in Pinellas County and the annual premium for two (2) employees has increased by 27% from Calendar Year 2009 to 2010. The CEO of United Healthcare made $3.2 Million dollars in cash compensation for Calendar Year 2008 not including stock options and other executive perks, so I am sure that he can afford to pay in excess of $15,000 per Year for health insurance, but this proposed increase could put me out of business.
I work with numerous other small businesses in this area and I cannot list a single business in this area (other than Progress Energy or other businesses without competition) that has the ability to pass along a 27% cost increase to their clients or customers with the state of our economy. At this rate, my annual health insurance premium costs will exceed my total for annual mortgage payments, car and property insurance costs as well as my real estate taxes.
The National Coalition on Health Care reports that premiums have increased 131% over the last decade. Based on the rate of increase proposed for this Year alone, this would make my health insurance premium increase run more in the range of 270% over the next decade. I can hardly wait to pay $45,000 per Year for coverage!! I am not sure how much more of this we can take as a Country, but I am thinking that Canada or England sound like really good places to retire about this time.
Does anyone in Washington get it?? Without real reform (and meaningful Governmental competition), we will always be stuck in this vicious cycle of ever increasing premiums with no real alternatives. I wish that I could get the same health care coverage that our elected officials receive (and at the same cost), but we are not being represented by our elected officials and I think this is a shame.
Posted by Kevin Silvey on 11/11/2009 @ 12:02PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I think more and more people are starting to open their eyes and see the big insurance corporations for what they are, no friends of the American people.
Single Payer Now!
pROFIT oUT oF oUR hEALTHcARE!
Posted by CherokeeGirl for Change on 11/11/2009 @ 04:27PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Increase unemployment as small businesses divest themselves of employees to avoid penalties?
Make the young buy insurance who can't afford it?
Increase the deficit 2.6 Trillion?
Start over Nancy. You are a cruel, ugly, piss-poor politician. We want it right! SIngle payer or nothing!
Posted by James Turner on 11/15/2009 @ 04:21AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.