Health Care

It's Annual Enrollment Time: Brace Your Wallet

Published November 02, 2009 @ 05:00AM PT

Beware Your Wallet

Halloween tricks were a warm-up. While Congress argues partisan, special-interest driven healthcare reform politics these next few weeks, many employees will be faced with a stark reminder of the need for reform. Yes, November is here – annual enrollment time for 60% of insured Americans. It is rapidly becoming known as “spend more, get less” time for group health plan participation.

Now, Joe Lieberman thinks healthcare reform is going too far, that a public option is “just unnecessary” and private health plan premiums will go up. He’s threatening to join a Republican filibuster because of his “concerns.” Uh, Joe? Don’t you dare. Those premiums have already gone up, with medical costs rising three times as fast as inflation. Premiums are skyrocketing with no public option, and AHIP has promised they will continue to do so. So if you filibuster to strip the people of their power, Joe, we will strip you of yours within the Senate.

But back to reality outside the Beltway. Group health plan premiums have risen 131% in the last 10 years, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. Employee contributions have risen 128%. Since 2006, the percentage of individual insured employees responsible for deductibles of $1,000 or more has more than doubled, from 10 to 22%. Companies still offering health benefits in 2009 downsized them – 86% now offer only one plan. That group ironically includes Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, whose 5,000 employees will now be offered only a high-deductible plan. Meanwhile AHIP is decrying government involvement in healthcare due to supposed lack of consumer choice.

For 2010, the picture gets uglier, according to Time.com. PriceWaterhouseCoopers says overall medical costs will rise 9%. Expect 40% of employers to shift even more premium cost to employees, and 39% to increase deductibles, co-payments, co-insurance, and out-of-pocket maximums. In fact more employers are gravitating to catastrophic healthcare policies that carry deductibles of $5,000 to $10,000 (I’ve been subject to two of these plans in the last 4 years.) Smaller employers are dropping coverage all together.

If that doesn't make you feel queasy enough, I have a challenge for you: ask your HR director how much your entire monthly premium is, before your employer's contribution. Then figure out what it would be under COBRA (i.e., if you left the company, willingly or unwillingly) by adding 2%. Let us know in the comments!

A friend of Change.org member Aaron Sidner, who recently found out she will be furloughed with US Air, was dumbfounded to find out her monthly COBRA premium is $1,000. She had been paying $100 per month while employed, just 10% of the total premium cost. Ouch. Of course, the government is still subsidizing 65% of COBRA premiums for those recently laid off. But that's actually you and me paying the bill.

Now for the hardest reality: no reform proposal being negotiated in D.C. changes any aspect of this dire situation. Except for a potential public option becoming available to small businesses, the employer-based insurance market is essentially left alone. Heck, Ron Wyden’s attempt to address it was soundly smacked down … by unions. I still remember Safeway employees picketing in the Bay Area in 2003 because their new contract required them to pay a small amount – for the first time ever – toward their health coverage.

Hopefully preventive care, wellness programs, and pay for performance programs will one day bend the cost curve. A strong public option available to everyone (the ideal Medicare For Everybody concept) could do more to diminish the financial appetites of an insatiable private insurance machine and “pay for quantity” provider juggernaut. But in the meantime, with nothing like that on the horizon, brace your wallet.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2305/3666949887_5c5cd45e98.jpg // CC BY 2.0

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (6)

  1. Harold Lewis

    On our policy, we've just gotten our increases of $10/ wk. in contribution, $5 on generic drugs, $15 on non-generic (even where there's no choice), and $5 to doctor visit copays.

    All things being equal, nothing going wrong, no illnesses, no added services, just the usual for the family, we will see an increase of $700 to our annual, out of pocket expenditures.

    In the meantime, we'll continue to support single-payer for the elderly, uninsured children, the indigent. We'll subsidize COBRA so the insurers can continue to make money. We'll watch as Congress passes a bill to subsidize some insurance premiums and mandate the purchase of private market policies which are a poor excuse for access to an ailing health care system.

    Imagine where I'd be if I didn't vote for hope and change.

    Posted by Harold Lewis on 11/02/2009 @ 09:58AM PT

  2. Jason Jaytheman

    Hey Harold, check with your state Insurance commissioner to see what mandates were added.

    Here in Colorado, Autisim was added to our state mandates which raised coverage costs by $100/yr.  http://www.state.co.us/gov_dir/leg_dir/olls/digest2009a/INSURANCE.htm 

    It is important to know that the increases are not just driven by "greed", but by increases in coverage.  Me: I dont have kids with autism, but it looks like I will be paying $100 more a year anyway.  Thanks CO state insurance commissioner!

    Posted by Jason Jaytheman on 11/02/2009 @ 05:18PM PT

  3. Reply to thread
  4. Martin Bring

    Today is the last day to impact the health care bill which will be taken up by Congress. As you know by now, the Kucinich Amendment, which protects the right of states to pursue single payer health care initiatives, was stripped from the legislation. The only way to reinstate it is for it to be included in a Manager's Amendment which will be completed this evening.

    There is no question that taking my Amendment out of the bill seriously weakens any effort to begin a single payer initiative. At the same time it is a stunning gift to insurance interests who are currently in legal battles across America to try to stop states from pursuing single payer, not-for-profit health care on behalf of their citizens. Without the Kucinich Amendment we will have no chance to pressure the insurance companies to keep premiums low. Without the Kucinich Amendment insurance companies will never have to worry about the ultimate threat to their profits, people taking control of their own health care destiny at a state level through single payer health care.

    Posted by Martin Bring on 11/02/2009 @ 10:00AM PT

  5. Martin Bring

    Posted by Martin Bring on 11/02/2009 @ 10:04AM PT

  6. Kevin Silvey

    I just received my annual renewal notice from United HealthCare in the mail today and have determined that the health insurance reform that I (and so many others) have been advocating for so long must be passed along with the inclusion of a strong public option or a single payer system.

    I own a small business in Pinellas County and the annual premium for two (2) employees has increased by 27% from Calendar Year 2009 to 2010.  The CEO of United Healthcare made $3.2 Million dollars in cash compensation for Calendar Year 2008 not including stock options and other executive perks, so I am sure that he can afford to pay in excess of $15,000 per Year for health insurance, but this proposed increase could put me out of business. 

    I work with numerous other small businesses in this area and I cannot list a single business in this area (other than Progress Energy or other businesses without competition) that has the ability to pass along a 27% cost increase to their clients or customers with the state of our economy.  At this rate, my annual health insurance premium costs will exceed my total for annual mortgage payments, car and property insurance costs as well as my real estate taxes. 

    The National Coalition on Health Care reports that premiums have increased 131% over the last decade.  Based on the rate of increase proposed for this Year alone, this would make my health insurance premium increase run more in the range of 270% over the next decade.  I am not sure how much more of this we can take as a Country, but I am thinking that Canada or England sound like really good places to retire about this time.

    Does anyone in Washington get it??  Without real reform (and meaningful Governmental competition), we will always be stuck in this vicious cycle of ever increasing premiums with no real alternatives.  I wish that I could get the same healthcare coverage that our elected officials receive (and at the same cost), but we are not being represented by our elected officials and I think this is a shame.

    Posted by Kevin Silvey on 11/11/2009 @ 12:06PM PT

  7. Reply to thread
  8. Gillian Hubble

    Kevin--Sorry to hear about your predicament. I just finished doing the complex calculus to figure out my healthcare expenses for next year. If I inadvertently venture out of network, I could pay over $31,000; if not, it will "only" be $10,000. This is for a plan that covers thousands of small businesses in Arizona.

    Yet Congress has judged it too expensive for the general population to receive the healthcare benefits they enjoy. Too expensive for whom?

    Posted by Gillian Hubble on 11/11/2009 @ 12:29PM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author
Gillian Hubble

Gillian Hubble is owner of Actively Fused, a consulting and healthcare advocacy firm, and a partner in KDG, a business development firm.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.