Health Care

New Healthcare Versus Old Healthcare: Mirror Images?

Published October 12, 2009 @ 06:00AM PT

 Hospital Mirror

This weekend I was in the Bay Area for a trail race, but I got to experience more than the scenic views from the Oakland hills. The bonus was a personal evaluation of Berkeley’s emergency care (yes, only a healthcare consultant could possibly see it that way.) It earned a “C”, meaning it was average US healthcare: not really good, not terrible, and anxiety-producing for all the wrong reasons. So what would change under proposed healthcare reform?

First, some background. For two days before the race I had vague abdominal discomfort, but chalked it up to female cyclical issues. A few hours into the race I was no longer able to breathe, much less move, without severe, stabbing abdominal pain. I was bloated, nauseated, lightheaded, and clammy. Later I learned it was a large ovarian cyst, extremely inflamed by the constant pressure of my hydration pack belt. It left me unable to ingest anything so I became dehydrated, which made existing kidney stones symptomatic. My race was over, but the fun had just begun.

EMTs wheeled me into the ER under 5 blankets and with a heated IV. I urgently told my significant other, “Call my insurance to make sure this hospital is in-network!” (In-network deductible: $5,000; out-of-network deductible: $15,000) [NO CHANGE.] He dashed off, cell phone in hand. Turns out they wouldn’t tell him anything; he wasn’t authorized. They hadn’t included an authorization form with the enrollment paperwork [NO CHANGE.]

A nurse did an initial assessment, and the next person through the door was the “Patient Counselor,” to complete bedside registration. The counseling part is for the uninsured, to sign them up for qualifying public programs so the hospital gets paid [PROCESS: NO CHANGE. FREQUENCY: LESS.]  “Do you have insurance?” she asked, demanding to see my ID and insurance card. My S.O. had them. Very irritated, she marched off to find him—after first obtaining all of my contact information, and his [NO CHANGE.]

Nurse #2 came in, and asked for the 7th time if I had any allergies (1-6: EMTs, first nurse.) Yes, NSAIDs – non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, like ibuprofen or aspirin. She asked me (7th time) if I was taking any medication. Again, yes [NO CHANGE.] Finally the doctor came in to do an evaluation. He cut off my S.O. when he answered some questions; I was a little incoherent. Nope, it had to come from me. And it better not take more than a minute. He ordered a CT, morphine, and anti-nausea medication [NO CHANGE.]

Four hours later I was discharged after the ER doctor told me to continue taking narcotics and NSAIDs. Um, I’m allergic to NSAIDs. Oh, that wasn’t in the computer. Seven times, people, SEVEN TIMES! He also told me to come back to the ER tomorrow for follow-up (personal calculator: minimum $400 and 3 hours, to add to that days’ $1,000+) [NO CHANGE.] Thanks, I’ll see my primary care doctor back home, with nothing but a discharge summary as the staff refused to print my labs or burn my CT onto CD (though I own that information under HIPAA.) They said to talk to medical records tomorrow [NO CHANGE.]

In the final analysis I have to agree with Ezra Klein. The “new” healthcare system looks a lot like the old one: it includes a few more patients in our insurance patchwork quilt of expensive, inefficient, and uncoordinated care. There is no requirement for a national healthcare record, though the HITECH bill provides incentives. But plans for Medicare pilot payment “bundling” programs may be our salvation, as they are the basis of “pay for performance.” That would certainly affect my Berkeley ER bill!

Since the Senate Finance Committee bill is widely expected to be rubber-stamped on Tuesday, we will focus on another type of healthcare bill this week – the one you get in the mail – and how reform may change its relationship to the care you receive. Tune in tomorrow for a crash course on how perfectly legal Medicare abuse can pad your healthcare bill.

Photo Lachlan // CC BY 2.0

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (5)

  1. CherokeeGirl  for Change

    Gillian, I've been meaning to say "welcome" and I like your writing style.

    I think we are all hoping the Baucus bill will get eaten up by the other 4 bills that have a public option.

    If the Baucus bill is endorsed by the president, which it hasen't been yet, there will be hell to pay.

    Everyone should recognize that bill was written for the insurance industry, and now they are working against it because it's been "ammended". Awww, poor babies.

    They are gonna put themselves out of business, because in this capitalistic society, the consumer rules. Consumers, now that they've seen the true evil nature of big insurance, will more and more just move to the public option out of spite.

    Posted by CherokeeGirl for Change on 10/12/2009 @ 12:25PM PT

  2. Gillian Hubble

    Thanks CherokeeGirl. Since I've been offline since Friday morning, I didn't realize that upgrades to the publishing platform left my "Meet the New Healthcare Editor" post (scheduled for Friday) somewhere in the ether. So apologies to everyone for not introducing myself sooner -- my intro post is now scheduled for Sunday, after we look at healthcare billing present and future.

    You are right that we can't lose focus on the content of the reform bills -- getting them passed isn't enough. If they don't include major changes in coverage, cost, AND delivery of care, as a country we lose anyway. 

    Anyone who hasn't already, please take action now. Sign your name to the petition at http://healthcare.change.org/actions/view/complete_kennedys_unfinished_work_--_pass_health_reform to let your senators know you demand real health reform.

    Posted by Gillian Hubble on 10/12/2009 @ 01:07PM PT

  3. Martin Bring

    Gillian,

    Sorry to hear about your bummer of a weekend with "the best health care system in the world."

    We can add yet another grievance to be addressed by health care reform: The freedom to travel without fear of being "out of network."

    Posted by Martin Bring on 10/13/2009 @ 12:30PM PT

  4. Gillian Hubble

    Great point, Martin. I was conscious, I had my insurance card, I had an advocate with me...none of it helped ensure I don't get hit with out-of-network rates. Why punish the patient for games insurers and providers play?

    Posted by Gillian Hubble on 10/13/2009 @ 01:52PM PT

  5. Harold Lewis

    Isn't it great how "competition" and the "free market" and the "profit motive" improve the quality of service? Good thing we're not a bunch of whiny, left-wing socialists or you might be dead!

    What your story of miserable treatment tels us, at its core, is that everyone wants to just get paid and is going through the motions to get heir money. In essence, the insurance companies really exist to insure that there is profit for ALL involved with US health care except for the patient.

    And to think, all the bills in Congress aim at doing is opening up the lousy system to more people - pump more money into a broken system in order to satisfy soem of the needs of those unable to access the system now.

    I've said it many times in past posts, insurance is not health care and until care is the central issue there will no meaningful change, no cost reduction, and no justice.

     

    Posted by Harold Lewis on 10/15/2009 @ 12:41PM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author
Gillian Hubble

Gillian Hubble is owner of Actively Fused, a consulting and healthcare advocacy firm, and a partner in KDG, a business development firm.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.