Pay for Performance: Why You Should Care (Part 2 of 3)
Published October 20, 2009 @ 06:00AM PT

Part 2: Empowered Patients
Last time we dug into what P4P actually is. Today we'll give you the P4P tools to become an empowered patient, and introduce you to their quality metrics basis. This will allow you to pay for quality versus average or sub-par care.
Ready? Quick! You’re having a heart attack. Your family called 911, and now the paramedics are asking which hospital you want to go to. How do you know? Your life may depend on it.
All right, hold that thought. Now would be a good time to divulge how quality is actually measured. Believe it or not, health plans and their contracted doctors and hospitals have been routinely collecting quality data since 1991.
That's when National Committee for Quality Assurance came out with HEDIS (Healthcare Data and Information Set) performance measures. They assess preventive care, like immunizations and cancer screenings, and disease management (for example, asthma, diabetes, hypertension – high blood pressure, heart disease and depression.) HEDIS scores are now a requirement to participate in Medicare Advantage, a privatized Medicare health plan. US News & World Report uses them for its annual America’s Best Health Plans report.
Hospitals have also had to collect core measures on care quality and safety since 1997, if they want Joint Commission accreditation (the brainchild of a doctor in 1910, to improve standards of care.) The focus in 2001 honed to heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and pregnancy-related conditions. Two years later surgical infection prevention measures were added. So what exactly do they measure? For heart attack, things like:
- Giving patients aspirin at hospital arrival and prescribing it at discharge,
- Giving patients anti-hypertensive (blood pressure lowering) medications and prescribing them at discharge,
- Time until patients are given clot-busting medications,
- Time until artery-opening surgery (percutaneous intervention, otherwise known as angioplasty or “the balloon procedure”)
- Smoking cessation counseling (if needed),
- And, of course, all-important inpatient mortality.
So what, you say? The Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) began collecting quality and patient satisfaction data in 2001. CMS bases quality bonuses on them in pilot areas. For the last 4 years, the Hospital Quality Demonstration Project involved 230 hospitals and 1.5 million patients. According to results released in August, during that time 4,700 heart attack deaths were prevented and overall quality in 5 areas (heart attack, heart failure, coronary artery bypass graft, pneumonia, and hip and knee replacements) increased by 17%. Yes, this stuff matters: this year, CMS will distribute $12 million in bonuses to top performers.
CMS also runs a Physician Group Demonstration project with 10 large providers that has yielded significant improvements in 32 clinical measurements for diabetes, heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure) and other conditions. In its third year, the program saved Medicare $32 million, a portion of which will be shared with 5 top-performing physician groups. Among those are Geisinger Clinic in Pennsylvania and Park Nicollet Health Services in Minnesota, which hit benchmarks on all 32 measures. CMS also has a new pilot measuring care improvements in 26 areas due to healthcare information technology.
So back to that life or death question of where to get help for your heart attack. Yes, there is helpful information out there, and being prepared is key. Unless you’re really proactive, you can’t control the state you live in – unfortunate, according to the Commonwealth Fund’s state rankings, which reveal wide disparities in care. But you can go to the Joint Commission’s public website, Quality Check, to view facilities and services both accredited and certified in your area.
Also check out NCQA’s report cards to choose high-quality health plans and doctors. Health plans are given starred ratings on 5 care aspects, and physicians are given recognition for patient-centered medical homes, heart and stroke treatment, diabetes treatment, and back pain treatment. And if you want hard-core, detailed data on how well hospitals care for patients with certain conditions, head to Medicare’s Hospital Compare tool. For instance, for hospitals within 25 miles of my zip code, I found that Tucson Medical Center actually provides better care for heart attack patients than University Medical Center, based on 7 very specific care measures and including the exact number of patients cared for.
More generalized quality information on doctors is harder to come by. We’ll tackle that in another post. But meanwhile, you’ve got some long-standing care-enhancing tools at your disposal and the promise of more widespread P4P in the future. Some providers are putting up a big fuss about that though. Find out why next time.
Update: Ezra Klein just posted an interview with Peggy O'Kane, NCQA President, on its latest State of Healthcare Quality report, to be released Thursday. It's worth a read.
Photo Cliff1066 // CC BY 2.0
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
How NOT to Measure Healthcare Quality
-
Pay For Performance: Why You Should Care (Part 1 of 3)
-
The Prescription for Revolutionary Healthcare Delivery Reform*
Comments (10)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email


















There's something missing here. You can take your employer-provided plan or forego the $13K in pre-tax income/benefits and buy your own. Your employer's plan covers the average hospital 10 minutes from home but not the excellent hospital 20 minutes away.
As a provider for your family, do you take the guaranteed pay cut on the off chance that you, your spouse or the kids get hurt seriously enough that average care won't cut it? or, do you figure that average care is good for what you're likely to need?
You also have to consider that an ambulance ride is not always covered. Had an instance where my daughter gashed her foot and needed stitches. At the time, my wife didn't have a car. She called the first aid and they took her to the hospital. Imagine the surprise when we got an ambulance bill and the insurance company telling us we should have called them, first (I guess you look to the wallet, first, when bleeding - no wonder the rest of the industrialized world thinks we're psychotic!). They would have advised taking a cab.
We live in a rural area. The few cabs are booked in advance taking seniors shopping and a client or two 60 miles away to the airport.
There's a preponderance of "Medicare" and "Medicaid" in so many of these studies and articles. But a good 75% of the population is working and paying taxes to support these programs. Many of us are still young, have families. Much more needs to be said for giving us a system which keeps us healthy, happy, and ably working to pay taxes. We also need to lay a foundation for the next generation to enter old age in better health.
We just need to know that is something goes wrong, there's a nearby facility to fix things up properly and that we won't be bankrupted, fleeced, or poorly treated. When local school systems have failed, the State has stepped in to replace corrupt and inept local administration - why can't something similar be done with hospitals that cannot achieve accreditation?
We shouldn't allow low-quality hospitals to operate. We also shouldn't be expected to choose providers under duress or settle for low-quality because of where we live or because of our employer's choice of plan. We shouldn't have to choose between buying insurance and saving for our kids' to go to college or to buy a house or to pay the bills - things most Medicare recipients are past worrying about.
Posted by Harold Lewis on 10/20/2009 @ 11:36AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Good point. The poison might be in the details. I hope they give the public a chance to read the bill before they vote or will they sneak it through without the American voter to consider?
Posted by M Arnest on 10/21/2009 @ 02:35PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Good rant Harold. The reason we see so many Medicare pilots is because it is the single largest insurer in terms of lives covered, and it has a vested interest in improving outcomes and reducing costs. Private insurers just raise premiums or adjust enrollment.
My intent with this installment was to give people the knowledge resources to get better care now, wherever they might live. Part 3 will cover a P4P program that covers all age groups, and the healthcare community's reaction to it. I look forward to your response to that one!
Posted by Gillian Hubble on 10/21/2009 @ 03:12PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Gillian, I'm loving this series of posts and look forward to the next.
I can appreciate the fact that Medicare is the largest single insurance bloc. But, the rest of us are being purposefully divided to prevent us from becoming an even larger, more formidable bloc and those divisions are being preserved, against our interests, in the guise of refrom, by our own government.
Forgive my rant but I've been a single-payer advocate since the mid '90s and I fear that a lack of voter passion has led to the lack of leadership in DC. Look at what the Teabaggers stirred up.
Posted by Harold Lewis on 10/22/2009 @ 06:13AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Did you see? Last night on Maddow she showed that all the screaming mimi's at the town halls HELPED us. They helped bring attention to the issue and made everybody look to see what all the fuss is. HA! :)
Also, I'm with you Harold about being skeptical of congress. They try to call a trigger a public option, like we don't know that means it will never happen.
They need to update their view of the public, because we are more savvy now. Single payer is growing in popularity the more these stories come out about the insurance companies denying coverage.
Posted by CherokeeGirl for Change on 10/22/2009 @ 11:07AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Harold, nothing to forgive and I couldn't agree more about the "divide and conquer" approach. I enjoy empowered rants.
Posted by Gillian Hubble on 10/22/2009 @ 12:35PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
You are overlooking an important contributor to this effort. Before CMS, before NCQA, before the JCAHO, there was the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4).
www.phc4.org
See a recent article in the Wall Street Journal
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125478721514066137.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_news
http://thehealthcaremaze.us
Posted by james mcgee on 10/21/2009 @ 06:47AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
James--good feedback. I'll add that to my list of resources. Does anyone have access to the full WSJ article? Only the first paragraph is available.
Posted by Gillian Hubble on 10/21/2009 @ 03:19PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The problem with quality care ratings is that patients have no say. Doctors report patients like me as successes when I am disabled as a result of specialists' inability to determine who was responsible for the diagnosis and treatment. I write about my experiences on my blog http://doctorblue.wordpress.com.
Posted by Anna Gardiner on 10/21/2009 @ 03:45PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I am sorry to hear about your misfortune. I have been on your web site.
The treating physician should not be the determinant of success. Unfortunately, many quality measures use a very basic outocme measure - did the patient survive? It has the advantage that there is no disputing the outcome state, but it fails to address the more difficult question - did it improve the health of the patient.
That is one reason why it so important to get everyone into the health care system and abolish these fragmented patient delivery and care delivery systems.
Now there is little incentive to view health care with any long term perspective. Not that there aren't a lot of people working in that direction as Gillian points out.
I wish you well
Posted by james mcgee on 10/21/2009 @ 05:22PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.