Senate Finance Committee Weakens Insurance Exchanges
Published October 06, 2009 @ 06:00AM PT

Goings-on in Maine are taking a deserved media hammering this week. First Brave New Films puts out a hard-hitting clip about Wellpoint suing the state to increase its profits. Then it leaks out that last Thursday, Maine Senator Olympia Snowe was the main reason Massachusetts Senator John Kerry's amendment to strengthen insurance exchange consumer protections in the Senate Finance Committee (SFC) bill didn't pass. I'd hate to find out those two things are related.
First, a little background. Maine is a guaranteed issue state, meaning insurers may not deny you coverage based on health status. They must also offer policies with standard benefits, co-payments, and co-insurance, and may only exclude pre-existing conditions for 6 months (this is sounding pretty good, no?) Anthem, a Wellpoint subsidiary, in return asked the state of Maine to guarantee it at least a 3% profit margin off its just 12,000 members. Maine said no. So Anthem is suing the state.
Now, about Kerry's proposed SFC bill amendment. Called "Empowering State Exchanges to be Prudent Purchasers," it sought to protect consumers with stronger state standards for insurance exchanges. HR 3200 and the Senate HELP bill have these protections built in; the SFC bill creates more of a Wild West of insurance exchanges. Just what we need.
The idea of exchanges is to provide individuals and small businesses the same sort of pre-screened menu of more affordable, guaranteed issue options that is available to employees of large corporations. Massachusetts created a successful "prudent purchaser" exchange 3 years ago, and premiums for its most closely managed insurance option, Commonwealth Care, have risen much more slowly than other medical costs. It not only negotiates with insurers for lower rates, but has strict standards for coverage AND customer service. So insurers might chafe, but consumers are safe.
Contrast that with the SFC model: a Yellow Pages for plans of unknown quality, that meet minimal standards (maybe they filled out an application to join?) Jon Kingsdale, the head of the Massachusetts exchange, calls that a "policy disaster." You should have peace of mind that if you buy what you thought was catastrophic coverage, it shouldn't turn out to be alternative housing coverage--a $200,000 lesson for Lawrence Yurdin in Austin, TX.
Hopefully Kerry's standards will prevail during the bill reconciliation process, for our sake. But Olympia knows how much private insurers hate conforming to state insurance standards. It makes her life difficult when lobbyists go into overdrive and racks up her state's legal costs. Maybe that's why she blocked such a common-sense amendment: Wellpoint has her number.
Image saikofish // CC BY 2.0
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Is National Healthcare Reform Repeating Massachusetts' Mistakes?
-
Can't Make Your Policy Federal? Empower the States.
-
9 New Surprises in President Obama's Speech
Comments (6)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email


















Gillian, I don't know you yet. I am a retired MD. PNHP member, 'MAD As HELL' and Docs4America member.
How many states are guaranteed issue states. Sounds exactly like something that would help all.
Posted by Lee Dorsey on 10/06/2009 @ 03:44PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Lee--good to meet you. I am the new healthcare editor, as Tim Foley is stepping into a guest-posting role. I'll be sending out a post introducing myself to everyone on Thursday.
Maine is one of only 4 states that offer guaranteed coverage on a full-time basis. Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York are the other ones. Other states offer convoluted versions of "sometimes" guarantees. The ugly details can be found here:
http://www.statehealthfacts.org/comparetable.jsp?cat=7&ind=353
More states don't do it for two reasons: 1) Private insurers avoid markets where they are legally bound not to cherry-pick members, and 2) if they do offer coverage it can be extremely expensive for state residents, as insurers want guaranteed profit margins (like the extreme case of Wellpoint demonstrates.) So unfortunately without strict standards like Massachusetts has, guaranteed issue at the state level can be a mixed blessing.
Posted by Gillian Hubble on 10/06/2009 @ 06:03PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I was wondering when Tim would burn out. He's worked so hard to make this the most well informed space on the internet (and any other media) on the issue of health care reform.
You've got some big shoes to fill Gillain. :)
Posted by Martin Bring on 10/07/2009 @ 07:29AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The airheads of Congress will keep their own plush healthcare plan - it's the rest of us guinea pigs who will be thrown to the wolves.
Posted by Martin Bring on 10/07/2009 @ 08:18AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I live in Jersey and look at it this way, if the insurers don't want to sell the product we want at a price we can afford they can just pack it in. Worst case, we all end up needing care and have no choice but to enact a single-payer system.
People have a human right to care, they even have a human right to profit by their labor, corporations have no human rights.
Posted by Harold Lewis on 10/07/2009 @ 01:13PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The only way Americans will get a Single Payer system is to systematically set fire to all the health insurance companies.
Posted by Martin Bring on 10/07/2009 @ 05:06PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.