Health Care

The Senators -- and the Yankees -- Need to Get On With It

Published November 06, 2009 @ 07:03PM PT

The New York Yankees may be World Champions, but they’re noteworthy this year for another reason: they have come up with the most obnoxious way to prolong games. All other teams in baseball have “mound conferences” -- timeouts when the catcher, the pitcher and sometimes the pitching coach meet on the pitching mound to make sure they know how to handle the next batter. But the Yankees do it with chutzpah -- all of the infielders are there discussing what pitch to throw next. I guess they think the second baseman might have a good idea on whether the hitter is thinking fastball or curve. Even that may be ok, but the Yankees also do it with shocking and excessive frequency -- including eight times in a single inning for one World Series game. The delays not only make already-long games much longer, but they’re prompting Major League Baseball to consider rule changes and disciplinary action.

I say if MLB does find a solution to the Yankees having Tupperware parties on the mound every time the score gets close, we should use it on the United States Senate.

If all goes well, the U.S. House of Representatives will vote on a historic comprehensive health reform bill tomorrow night. If all isn’t well, it may take a couple of extra days, making this the first health care deadline that the House leadership has missed in this months-long process. But the Senate is a different story. Despite a Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee bill that was finished in mid-July and a Senate Finance Committee bill that was finished over a month ago, Majority Leader Reid still has given no clear indication of when a Senate debate is likely to start, let alone end. The same Senate health care bill process that Sen. Max Baucus once confidently predicted would be over by the Fourth of July will now be lucky to finish by Christmas -- but, the Majority Leader cautions, don’t hold us to that.

To be clear, I’m not advocating a “rush it and get it wrong” approach like what the Bush Administration and Republican-controlled Congress did with Medicare Part D, introducing the bill and passing it within hours. Despite the Republican nay-sayers channeling their inner Simon and Garfunkle and proclaiming, “slow down, you move too fast” no matter what deadlines the Senate Democrats blow through, we’re far, far away from anything that could remotely be considered rushing. As Ezra Klein points out, “If you're tracking Obama, then he's been moving on health-care reform for 29 months. If you're tracking the congressional process, then it's 17 months. If you're tracking the first new bill introduced in this round, then it's 33 months.” As Obama liked to joke about the presidential campaign during its final months, “There are babies walking and talking who weren’t even born yet when we started all this.”

More to the point, although the extra consultation time may help the Yankees make a perfect pitch, more time does not guarantee a better result for the Senate. Instead, it means more time for industry lobbyists to get to work on undermining the financing provisions. It means more time for recalcitrant centrist Democrats to up their own importance by publicly expressing their doubts. It means the continued clogging of the legislative pipeline, kicking other priorities like job creation, financial regulation, climate change and more down the road. It means continuing to paralyze states, who need to reform their own health care budgets in the face of their rising budget deficits but are afraid to make a move until they know how the federal reform will affect them. And, worst of all, it means delaying further the positive effects of reform at a time when the country is still shedding jobs and with them, benefits (albeit at a much slower pace than a few months ago). It means more going without care and yes, more literally dying because our dysfunctional health care system leaves them behind.

Maybe Robinson Cano and Derek Jeter know how to get Lincoln, Landrieu, Nelson and Lieberman to vote for cloture. Let’s call a timeout and ask them. Or, better yet, let’s start the debate on the damn bill.

(Photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisptacek/ / CC BY 2.0)

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (3)

  1. Lauren Serven

    Here's a debate they should be having:

     

    1. Open up Medicare for anyone who wants to buy in.  You could help fund it for Seniors and provide affordable insurance for anyone who is sick of their private insurers. Remember the deal was if you liked your insurance you could keep it. Well, isn't it about time we let people dump the insurance they have if they don't like it.

    2. Decide on the reimbursement rates for the medical professionals. Medicare plus 5,6,7,8,9,10... Maybe you could just get it running and see with the intent to review after a year.

    3. Tell the insurance companies they can just do business any stinkin' way they f-ing please. No reforms. With a Medicare for anyone PO they will have to readjust their business models to stay competitive. They will have to think about their premium costs. Gee, they may even have to provide health coverage. 

     

     

    By following these 3 simple steps, the 1000 plus pages of legislation being bickered over in the Congress could be streamlined into a system of healthcare administration that is quite efficient. Medicare works, but it needs some capital. Let some younger healthier people buy into the system to beef up that insurance pool. We really can stop all this nonsense already don't you think?? 

    Posted by Lauren Serven on 11/06/2009 @ 07:58PM PT

  2. Harold Lewis

    Nah, too simple. How will we scapegoat immigrants, women seeking abortions, generations that didn't fight WWII, liberals, socialists, the poor?

    Without these divisions, what would the parties stand for? How would I know who's on my side and not your side? Can't have elections between our capital-first parties unless we can keep a clear distinction between "us" and "them".

    It takes skillful lawyering and exhaustive gibberish crafted by professional insiders and lobbyists to make sure that it's someone's fault. Wouldn't want to upset our political evolution.

    Posted by Harold Lewis on 11/09/2009 @ 07:05AM PT

  3. Harold Lewis

    At least, in theory, baseball has umpires who can deny the timeouts and move the game along. The only things which move Congress along are grave threats to Wall St.

    Only benefits to stockholders merit quick and decisive action. The voters get plodding, deliberative action based on the search for benefits to corporations in any piece of legislation that might benefit only the voters.

    And, if you don't like it, you can always vote to change which pro-corporation party takes power.

    The saddest part is that, no matter which course of action they ultimately choose, the Senators will vote for some trickle-down market solution favoring the entities that brought us this busted system, anyway. So, let's just get it over with.

    Posted by Harold Lewis on 11/09/2009 @ 07:22AM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Timothy Foley

Tim has been an online organizer and blogger on health care policy for the Obama for America campaign (during the primaries) and currently for the Committee of Interns and Residents/SEIU Healthcare, a labor union for intern and resident doctors. Views expressed here are Tim's, and don't represent the positions of CIR or SEIU.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.